Free Persuasive Essays On The Death Penalty

Essay/Term paper: Capital punishment should be abolished

Essay, term paper, research paper:  Persuasive Essays

See all college papers and term papers on Persuasive Essays

Need a different (custom) essay on Persuasive Essays? Buy a custom essay on Persuasive Essays

Need a custom research paper on Persuasive Essays? Click here to buy a custom term paper.


PERSUASIVE ESSAY

Capital Punishment should be Abolished
Evidence suggests that the death penalty does not deter people from committing crimes. It is a cruel and cold blooded form of punishment and there have been instances where innocent people were sentenced to death and later found to be innocent.

The most common methods of execution are hanging and shooting. Countries like the U.S. use electrocution, gas chambers and lethal injections to dispose of the convicted. Some countries, like the U.S., have tried to minimise the pain of execution by introducing the electric chair. In some parts of the world, more pain is deliberately inflicted on the condemned, such as in the Islamic countries and Nigeria. In Nigeria the executions are done in public by a firing squad. The convicted are executed slowly, by firing bullets at intervals, starting at the ankles. In Islamic countries the condemned are stoned to death. But there are special rules for these executions; (Amnesty International article1), "The Islamic Penal Code of Iran stipulates: "In the punishment of stoning to death, the stones should not be so large that the person dies on being hit by one or two of them."1 This is the kind of cruelty which is inflicted on the executed in those countries. Other methods of execution, like the electric chair and hanging, are also quite cruel to the convicted. That is one of the reasons the death penalty should be abolished.

Does the death penalty really deter criminals?
There is very little valid evidence to suggest that capital punishment deters criminals. The most recent study of research findings on the relationship between the death penalty and homicide rates, conducted for the United Nations Committee on Crime Prevention and Control, in 1988, has concluded that:"this research has failed to provide scientific proof that executions have a greater deterrent effect than life imprisonment."1. Many murders are committed under the influence of alcohol and drugs, some murderers might be mentally ill. If one of these factors influenced a person, how could he/she control and asses what he/she is doing or be deterred from committing the crime? It would be impossible, and after the incident he/she might not remember it. A cover story in the "Time"3 presents a report about a man called Doug McCray, then 32. He had a reasonable education after dropping out of college one and a half years later to enlist in the army. He was given a medical discharge seventeen months later. He married and went back to college. But his marriage didn't last long and he dropped out of college again and turned to alcohol. Sometime between October 13 and 15, 1973 a woman was raped and beaten to death. He was arrested and charged with murder because he was drunk and could not tell where he was at the time of the murder. The FBI had matched his palm print with the one found in the women's apartment. Ten years later McCray still doesn't know if he was guilty or not. He was found guilty and is in Florida's death row. This anecdote clearly indicates the possibility of executing a person who might not have committed the crime.
Some emotionally ill people would see death as the only route to freedom, so the death penalty does not deter them at all. If the death penalty does not deter many people, then why would you want to introduce it in the first place?
A better deterrent is needed, which would make finding the culprit easier and quicker, making it impossible for criminals to get away with what they have done. If such a deterrent was found then criminals would have second thoughts of commiting the crime because they would think that they might get caught. Criminals who plan their crimes very carefully, won't be deterred by the death sentence because they would believe that they won't be caught.



Delay is also what makes capital punishment less of a deterrent, because it minimizes the chances of a convicted criminal ever being executed. Usually when a person is sentenced to death, it would take years until he/she would be executed. In the U.S. it takes an average of three years for, a so called capital case, to work its way up to the highest court. If an appeal is made it would delay the execution by five to ten years. "Willie Francis, 17, survived a sub-lethal shock from the electric chair in 1946. It took another year for him to be executed."3 This kind of delay would not be likely to deter many other criminals.

A study made in the U.S., of death row inmates has found that 62 percent were unskilled workers, 60 percent were unemployed and a majority of these people were represented by lawyers with less than five years experience. Clifton Duffy, former warden of San Quentin Prison in California, and others have testified that capital punishment is "a privilege of the poor." People who are inadequately represented are more likely to lose their case and this is what makes capital punishment unfair because poor people are more likely to be sentenced to death than rich people.


Murder cannot be cured by murder. The death penalty is cruel, inhumane and above all irreversible. It does not deter and isn't as effective as life imprisonment. Hugo A. Bedau, professor of philosophy at Tufts University says, "The death penalty guarantees that the person on whom it is inflicted will commit no more crimes. He is prevented, not deterred, from so doing. But death, is too high a price to pay when studies show that convicted murderers rarely commit another violent crime. To prevent the occasional repeat murder, everyone convicted of criminal homicide would have to be executed- a policy too brutal to consider and one that would require dozens of legal killings each day."
The United Nations began urging worldwide abolition on the grounds that,"every human has an inherent right to life."

It can be seen that there is no logical reason for reintroducing capital punishment. The fact that there is no evidence to support the view that it deters criminals, that it is irreversible and an inhumane punishment suggests that capital punishment should be abolished worldwide.




REFERENCES
1)"Simply Living" Vol.4 No.4 1989, "The Green Pages:Amnesty International, Campaign to abolish the death penalty"
2)Encyclopaedia Britannica, Britannica center, Instant Research service, "The debate over capital punishment", "Arguments for abolition of death penalty"
3)"Time", January 24, 1983, "An Eye for an Eye"

 

Other sample model essays:

Persuasive Essays / Capital Punishment Should Be Restored

Justice must be done. Capital punishment is the just punishment for serious crime offenders and must be imposed. First, the basis of a punishment must be just and fair to both the victims and t...

Persuasive Essays / Capitalism Or Communism

Was Richard Wright"s Native Son a story about his views towards Capitalism and Communism ? Did Richard Wright want to show the good and bad points towards Capitalism and Commun...

Macbeth / Captians Letter Regaurding Macbeth

Dear Family: I beg forgiveness for the prolonged period of silence previous to this letter. It had been difficult to write during our battles with the rebels. Things have quieted now for the ...

Poetry / Carl Sandburg 2

The beloved poet, Carl Sandburg, changed the course of American poetry. He was a poet, novelist, journalist, and songwriter, yet the influence of his works have not always been acknowledged. Carl...

Persuasive Essays / Carl Sandburg

Carl Sandburg Carl Sandburg was a great man. His life was one of fame, once he began writing. He inspired many people. He also became an American Marvel. His works still remain read ...

Persuasive Essays / Carpe Diem

Carpe Diem: The Golden Chance Carpe Diem, is the expression that means seize the day, means that one should take advantage of every minute of this life. Many people do not succeed because they ar...

Persuasive Essays / Carroll's Alice In Wonderland

by Andrew Green Did you read and enjoy Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland books as a child? Or better still, did you have someone read them to you? Perhaps you discovered them as an adult or, ...

Persuasive Essays / Case Of The Broken Hutch

THE CASE OF THE BROKEN HUTCH I would like to write a story about a conflict I had with a past boss. It had to deal with the fact that he did not want to hear my side of the story, and listen to...

Persuasive Essays / Casino

Casinos have become a large part of cities" economy and hundreds of thousands of people"s lives. Casinos are exciting for many people who feel they have a chance to win it big. Because s...

Persuasive Essays / Casinos

Casinos Are casinos good for Ontario? To every situation there are positive and negative points. In the situation of casinos, the positive side has a very strong case that outweighs the negat...

The majority of Americans have a clear and strong stance when it comes to the death penalty, no matter which side of the debate they sit on. Supporters of this punishment argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime, and that justice is being served. My personal stance on the death penalty is that it is an outdated and ineffective punishment, serving no true benefit to society and causing more harm than good to society as a whole.

When looking at the argument that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to others thinking about committing the same crime, we need only look to other countries around the world as examples to disprove this. Throughout the world, we are able to see that, in those countries where there is no death penalty, murders and other violent crimes happen at a much lower rate than in the United States. It does seem counter-intuitive, but the evidence is clear.

We can also clearly see that, in the United States, many people still commit these horrendous crimes, knowing full well that capital punishment exists. In the heat of the moment, when a person is not thinking clearly and logically, the existence of the death penalty and the possibility that they could be facing this punishment does not typically cross their mind, and cause them to alter their behavior. The consequences of their actions are not at the forefront of their minds while they’re in the midst of carrying out those actions. We can see this in the consistent, and increasing, number of violent crimes being committed year after year in this country.

There have also been widely publicised cases of wrongly convicted individuals, who were either put to death or were awaiting their punishment, that were revealed to be innocent. In the cases where the death penalty had already been carried out, it was too late for those innocent people. And, in the cases where innocence was discovered in time, we can only be thankful that it wasn’t too late. There are definitely cases of people being wrongly accused and convicted, and for each case that’s brought to light, we must keep in mind that there are likely more that we’ve never – and will never – hear about. Having even one innocent person put to death wrongly is a crime unto itself.

We must also look at the mental competence of the individuals being convicted and sentenced to this punishment. If a person is not mentally capable of processing and understanding the actions they have committed, it is ethically wrong to execute them for this.

When looking at the ethics of capital punishment, it’s also essential to assess whether or not it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. There have been advancements in the technologies being used to enact the death penalty that are designed to lessen the pain and suffering a person endures. But, in reality, the only individuals who can attest to their effectiveness are those being executed. We cannot say for certain whether or not someone suffered unduly while they were being executed, whether everything worked as it should to ensure a quick and painless death.

And, yes, there are those who will argue that a death marked by pain and suffering is a part of the justice being served. But, as we try to hold ourselves as a nation to a higher standard than our worst criminals, we should at the very least allow our justice system to work as it should, according to the Supreme Court. And, nowhere in history has the Supreme Court ever advocated for the use of cruel and unusual punishment. We would like to think that we have more compassion and humanity than those who have committed such horrendous crimes, and as such, we should demonstrate this by showing them the humanity they denied someone else, not by sinking to their level.

The argument for or against the death penalty has been passionately argued throughout our nation’s history, with each side having their own strong viewpoints. When we look at the evidence from around the world on the effectiveness of capital punishment as a deterrent, as well as the ethical dilemma of potentially executing innocent or mentally incompetent individuals, it is easy to see that the practice of capital punishment offers no benefits to our society.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *